Changes

Of course, It comes as no surprise that the Amstrad CPC464 loose by far as lost to the BBC micro . The BBC was owned , of course, commissioned and promoted by the BBC... just like , so that the channel broadcasting this programm. It was clearly cheated with the "this old junk BBC do have more softwares than the brand new released Amstrad" argument. As this granted an awfull lot criteria used were biased in favor of "points" compaired to others tests the Amstrad won by far. The Graphical capabilities was a bit cheated too. The CPC could display twice maximum colours (16) despite in large pixels modeAcorn machine.

The Fullscreen trick wasn't quite known at For instance, they overplayed the time despite enabling Amstrad's CPC to really get a resolution comparable to BBC'ssoftware quantity point; but this would leave any new machine fighting an uphill fight. Also, the graphical capabilities were not protrayed accurately, maybe because they were not fully understood.

[[Category:CPC History]][[Category:Video contents| ]]