Talk:MegaROM - Revision history

TFM at 17:31, 18 July 2011

2011-07-18T17:31:39Z

TFM at 17:30, 18 July 2011

2011-07-18T17:30:50Z

Bryce at 15:38, 16 July 2011

2011-07-16T15:38:36Z

TFM: Created page with "Hi Bryce. Why did you delete the Category:FutueOS. FutureOS is running on the MegaROM, or is it not?"

2011-07-15T16:49:27Z

Created page with "Hi Bryce. Why did you delete the Category:FutueOS. FutureOS is running on the MegaROM, or is it not?"

New page

Hi Bryce. Why did you delete the Category:FutueOS. FutureOS is running on the MegaROM, or is it not?

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:31, 18 July 2011
Line 3:		Line 3:
	:Yes, but you don't seriously want to add the category FutureOS to every single piece of hardware that works with FOS do you? In that case, you would have to add it to every ROMBoard, then you would have to add a SymbOS category to them too, then a MAXAM category..... etc. The categories don't make sense if they are over-used or used as links.		:Yes, but you don't seriously want to add the category FutureOS to every single piece of hardware that works with FOS do you? In that case, you would have to add it to every ROMBoard, then you would have to add a SymbOS category to them too, then a MAXAM category..... etc. The categories don't make sense if they are over-used or used as links.

−	::Well, it make only sense if there is a connection between hardware and software. In this case we can let it like it is. However it would help people to find needed hardware in the [[FutureOS]] category. So if somebody searches a ROM board f. e. to run FutureOS, just take a look in the ~~cagegory~~. On the other hand this may not be the sense of a category.--[[User:TFM\|TFM]] 19:30, 18 July 2011 (CEST)	+	::Well, it make only sense if there is a connection between hardware and software. In this case we can let it like it is. However it would help people to find needed hardware in the [[FutureOS]] category. So if somebody searches a ROM board f. e. to run FutureOS, just take a look in the category. On the other hand this may not be the sense of a category.--[[User:TFM\|TFM]] 19:30, 18 July 2011 (CEST)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 Hi Bryce. Why did you delete the Category:FutueOS. FutureOS is running on the MegaROM, or is it not?
-Yes, but you don't seriously want to add the category FutureOS to every single piece of hardware that works with FOS do you?
+:Yes, but you don't seriously want to add the category FutureOS to every single piece of hardware that works with FOS do you? In that case, you would have to add it to every ROMBoard, then you would have to add a SymbOS category to them too, then a MAXAM category..... etc. The categories don't make sense if they are over-used or used as links.
 In that case, you would have to add it to every ROMBoard, then you would have to add a SymbOS category to them too, then
-a MAXAM category..... etc. The categories don't make sense if they are over-used or used as links.
+::Well, it make only sense if there is a connection between hardware and software. In this case we can let it like it is. However it would help people to find needed hardware in the [[FutureOS]] category. So if somebody searches a ROM board f. e. to run FutureOS, just take a look in the cagegory. On the other hand this may not be the sense of a category.--[[User:TFM|TFM]] 19:30, 18 July 2011 (CEST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:38, 16 July 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Hi Bryce. Why did you delete the Category:FutueOS. FutureOS is running on the MegaROM, or is it not?		Hi Bryce. Why did you delete the Category:FutueOS. FutureOS is running on the MegaROM, or is it not?
		+
		+	Yes, but you don't seriously want to add the category FutureOS to every single piece of hardware that works with FOS do you?
		+	In that case, you would have to add it to every ROMBoard, then you would have to add a SymbOS category to them too, then
		+	a MAXAM category..... etc. The categories don't make sense if they are over-used or used as links.